Validate
URL, platform, bid, budget and tracking requirements are checked at submission.
Campaign review
Campaigns are validated immediately and enter an Admin review queue; ADJODO does not silently approve unsafe spend.

URL, platform, bid, budget and tracking requirements are checked at submission.
An authorized Admin decides before the campaign reaches publishers.
Campaigns can pause for budget, performance or manual reasons without losing history.
A campaign submission can be examined for missing or unsupported fields before it is ready for a human decision. URL, platform, bid, budget and tracking requirements give that first validation a concrete scope. Passing those checks means the submitted values satisfy the supported entry rules; it does not establish that the campaign should automatically be distributed. ADJODO's review workflow keeps that distinction visible.
An advertiser should be able to identify what needs correction at submission and what requires an authorized review afterwards. This page concerns the approval process rather than an AI decision service. Keeping the stages separate prevents a completed form or a successful destination check from being mistaken for permission to send traffic or spend funds without the remaining campaign review.
Use a clear campaign objective, accurate destination and relevant tracking details instead of a vague description of the business. Explain the platform, country and intended action so the reviewer can understand what publishers would be promoting. If the destination is an app, make the application identity explicit; if it is a web page, check that the promoted offer is visible there. Keep configuration labels consistent across the submission and the integration.
A reviewer should not have to guess whether a callback belongs to the same campaign or whether an old link template was copied accidentally. Correct known validation errors before submitting again. A complete, coherent brief reduces avoidable back-and-forth without promising that every campaign will receive approval or that review will finish within an unconfirmed fixed time.
After submission, use the account's campaign status to understand the next step. A pending campaign, an approved campaign and a paused campaign describe different operational states. Do not ask publishers to treat a submitted campaign as available simply because the form accepted it. If an authorized reviewer requests a correction, preserve the original issue and the revised detail so the change can be understood.
Budget or manual controls may later affect a campaign even after its initial approval. Keep those state changes with the launch notes rather than interpreting every pause as the same kind of rejection. The review history matters because a campaign can evolve, and a clear record helps the account team distinguish a configuration correction from a later distribution or funding decision.
A reliable workflow makes clear which checks are mechanical and which decision belongs to an authorized person. Automated validation can help identify an incomplete URL or an unsupported value, but it cannot make every statement about an offer true. Human review still needs an understandable brief and relevant evidence. This feature page should therefore not be read as an unlimited automated-approval promise or a way to bypass the review queue.
For a delayed or unclear status, contact support with the campaign reference and the specific state shown in the account. Do not send secrets to accelerate an investigation. The useful outcome is a campaign whose validation, review decision and operational state are documented clearly enough that advertisers, publishers and administrators understand what has been authorized and what still needs attention.